• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Scanning Hardware
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Scanning Hardware


  • Subject: Scanning Hardware
  • From: Bert <email@hidden>
  • Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2000 10:14:39 -0800

Enlarging a 35mm that much will be more test of the film's grain
characteristics than the scanner's abilities. When scanning higher-speed
35mm film (more grain) my experience has been that scanning at a lower rez
and sampling the image up in Photoshop gives a more pleasing result. You get
a softer look to the film grain.

Scanning a nice Fuji Velvia slide is a different story. A drum scanner will
get better detail out of the shadows, if there is detail there, and it will
do it with less noise than an older, pre-active-cooling CCD scanner.


Cheers,
Bert




on 12/12/00 11:39 AM, G BALLARD at email@hidden wrote:

> Good day!
>
> Question: Is an older Scitex flatbed scanner comparable, in overall
> quality,
> to a newer drum scanner for 4-color, fine-art poster?
>
> The media scanned is 35mm slide transparency, 87.3MB, 6766 pixels tall.


  • Prev by Date: Re: Monitor calibration / Gamma settings and white point
  • Next by Date: Re: ColorSync monitors
  • Previous by thread: Re: Scanning Hardware
  • Next by thread: monitor optimizer software + profileRGB
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread