R: R: CM in A C-T-P SYSTEM
R: R: CM in A C-T-P SYSTEM
- Subject: R: R: CM in A C-T-P SYSTEM
- From: "Vincenzo Sarracino" <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2001 22:36:33 +0200
There are other advantages about halftone digital proofing.
The most important thing is that the file is not modified.
When you apply a CMS the dot of color must change. If you have 30%C and 20%Y
it become 15 and 10 on other printers, for example.
Another thing is that the color space is not the same of the offset and must
be done some rendering intent to match with compression of color.
An halftone color proofing don't touch the file and has the same color space
of the offset, on the same paper. That is great and affordable.
-----Messaggio originale-----
Da: email@hidden [
mailto:email@hidden]
Inviato: giovedi 17 maggio 2001 2.03
A: email@hidden; email@hidden
Oggetto: Re: R: CM in A C-T-P SYSTEM
In a message dated 5/15/01 7:20:41 PM, email@hidden writes:
>
Without film you can't see moirh, trapping, overprint, and you can't see
>
if
>
>
your separations is good before to print the job on the press.
>
>
I suggest to use profile as separation mode, but to check the separation
>
>
with a contractual proofer like Kodak Approval, an halftone digital
proofing
>
>
system. In this manner you can check the proof to see moirh, trapping and
>
>
other things (like color, densities, Pantone color etc...) before that
>
you
>
>
put yours job on the press.
Lacking real analog, create your own analog from the digital... interesting
approach, which will appeal to those who aren't happy without the analog
version. Personally I find the digital versions suit all my needs, except
perhaps image to screen angle moire, and I am happiest checking that on
screen at a generous magnification from a real dot seperation, if one is
available. No guarantee anything that invents its own dots will accurately
describe this anyhow..
C. David Tobie
Design Cooperative
email@hidden