RE: LaCie electronblue19
RE: LaCie electronblue19
- Subject: RE: LaCie electronblue19
- From: "shAf" <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2001 09:26:58 -0700
neil writes ...
>
> shAf :o) wrote: That is, I believe
>
> they implied some monitors are aimed at macintosh
>
> systems and their native gamma is therefore close
>
> to 1.8, ... whereas monitors in general have
>
> a native gamma closer to 2.2 (~2.5). ...
>
Linear gamma or more correctly no clut gamma correction
>
going to the crt cannons is not a design intention
>
and in no way reflects the operating system
>
preferences from a manufacturing point of view. ...
I continue to shop around ... and thought I'd post a wwwpage provided
by one monitor manufacturer ... in this case LG Electronics ... and I
wish more manufactures posted such technical information.
http://www.lgeservice.com/chrom.html
It is interesting to note the variation in "white gamma" ... and ask
if this is possibly different from what we are referring to as "native
gamma"(?).
As has been stated many times, these chromacity values shouldn't be
depended on, and they're like to change from one monitor to another
... but still, from a purchasing point of view, this is good info to
scrutenize. BTW, how do these chromacity values hold up to what I
might want to find ... for example, the Flatron 915FT doesn't appear
to be much larger than sRGB.
shAf :o)