Re: New gamma definitions in ColorVision products?
Re: New gamma definitions in ColorVision products?
- Subject: Re: New gamma definitions in ColorVision products?
- From: Mark Schaefer <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2001 11:45:19 -0600
Neil,
I thought it was me: the new LCD ColorVision spyder and OptiCal 3.5 creates
monitor profiles on my same Mac that look different than the same NEC
monitor profiled under 3.1. Does this mean I should be doing something
different?
Trying to get the LCD Apple monitor and my 21" NEC monitor to roughly agree
has been a real challenge.
The upgrade also did not remove the "optical startup" from my system folder,
so it kept opening up the Optical 3.5 program on every restart till I
disabled it.
--On 12/16/01 12:11 PM, neilB caused electrons to form the following
pattern:
>
David
>
On 13/12/01 at 9:54 am, email@hidden wrote:
>
>
> I'd recommend using PhotoCAL 2.5.1 from the colorcal.com website for
>
> this (or OptiCAL 3.5), as they use new gamma definitions that should be more
>
> compatible with OS X (as well as Acrobat and InDesign).
>
>
new gamma definitions??
>
>
does this mean that ColorVision are now calibrating to a new
>
standard and we should expect to see a change in appearance to our
>
screens calibrated / profiled with either OptiCal, pre 3.5 or
>
PhotoCal pre 2.5?? [I'm seeing a big change].
>
>
Regards
>
>
NeilB
>
>
- - - - - - - Neil Barstow - Colour Management Consulting - - - - - - -
>
>
p: 44 (0) 1273 774 704 f: 44 (0) 1273 323 454 m: 44 (0) 77 78 16 02 01
>
_______________________________________________
>
colorsync-users mailing list | email@hidden
>
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
>
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/colorsync-users
>
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
>
Regards,
Mark
___________________________
Mark Schaefer
MMLC
Multimedia Learning Center
Northwestern University
Evanston IL USA
847-467-5654 v
847-467-1941 fx
email@hidden