• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Colorvision Spyder& photocal vs Lacie Blue eye
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Colorvision Spyder& photocal vs Lacie Blue eye


  • Subject: Re: Colorvision Spyder& photocal vs Lacie Blue eye
  • From: Andrew Rodney <email@hidden>
  • Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2001 10:42:56 -0700

on 3/9/01 7:09 AM, email@hidden at email@hidden wrote:

> Andrew is seldom in error...

Ah, if only that were true!

The other issue is that EVEN IF the LaCie solution produced results that we
expect, it's vastly more expensive and less capable (software wise) as the
Spyder with Optical. We are talking a good $200 difference in price. I find
this very odd as my experience with LaCie products, both display and other
items is that this is a company that provides very good products at a great
price. The LaCie Blue-Eye solution is not in line with their approach over
the years. The 22" Blue Mitsubishi display they OEM is a great unit at a
great price. It's a shame that the Blue Eye pick and software is priced as
it is.

Andrew Rodney


References: 
 >Re: Colorvision Spyder& photocal vs Lacie Blue eye (From: email@hidden)

  • Prev by Date: Re: ICC DCam
  • Next by Date: Custom paper profiles for Adobe PressReady?
  • Previous by thread: Re: Colorvision Spyder& photocal vs Lacie Blue eye
  • Next by thread: Re: Colorvision Spyder& photocal vs Lacie Blue eye
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread