• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Spectral Response and Colorimeters....
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Spectral Response and Colorimeters....


  • Subject: Re: Spectral Response and Colorimeters....
  • From: "Michael S. Dodds" <email@hidden>
  • Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2002 18:19:56 +0000

> On the other hand, I have found that there is a lot of sloppy work in the
> field as well. It makes no sense to profile a device that does not have an
> associated solid quality assurance test. At the start of this whole mess, I
> was very vocal about including a set of densitometric readings of known
> patches in the profile. My point was that these patches could be monitored
> using simple densitometric devices and we would then be assured that the
> profile we are using would be based upon known device parameters. If the
> simple measurements were off, we would know that the profile was no longer
> accurate. That sort of fell on deaf ears and now the average user has no
> standard mechanism to test the device to see if it has drifted relative to
> the profile....For some, it made more sense to go through the whole profile
> generation process another time, but we then we still have the constant
> uncertainty of machine performance vs. profile accuracy. In my opinion, the
> Color Mangement Providers have not provide the necessary quality assurance
> tools to allow the customer to use the process with any objective degree of
> certainty. That's a roadblock to success that should be addressed.
>
> Tom Lianza
> Technical Director
> Sequel Imaging Inc.
> 25 Nashua Rd.
> Londonderry, NH 03053
> email@hidden
----
I think the printing process needs to keep its concerns
to some type of minimum. Getting 2 different press
operators to operate the same press in an exact manner
is next to impossible. You stick the Gretag Bars on there
and there is plenty for a good operator to consider.
Density - gain - slur - plate quality -- it is all there.
Many press guys use just the density chips. (unfortunate)
Watch a couple guys run a press -- One operator will
run his plates nice and dry and get good clean dots
and good solid density. The next fellow comes in at the beginning of the
next shift - and, soon, the plate is glistening wet with water
creating slur and emulsification of the inks.
BUT - the densities may be identical.
(Just keep piling on the ink).
-- The press profile is, no doubt, invalidated.

If the operators needed to be concerned adout
matching density of 280 different chips -
the would be very difficult people to be around, indeed.
-- Also,
With todays costs and "money saving" concerns -
there is no room on a job press sheet
for the IT8 chart.
Hell - I often have no room for color bars at all.
--
The standard Gretag color Bars can run a press.
--
We need to get our OLD and NEW presses
running as well and consistently as possible -
then feed them plates made with the
individual press characteristics being considered.

OH well !
MSD


  • Prev by Date: Re: Paper white and the seven dwarves
  • Next by Date: perfect rgb references
  • Previous by thread: perfect rgb references
  • Next by thread: Re: Which scanner "Job Setting" to produce raw RGB on
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread