Because we can...should we? (Was: Adobe RGB?)
Because we can...should we? (Was: Adobe RGB?)
- Subject: Because we can...should we? (Was: Adobe RGB?)
- From: Tom Orino <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 16:40:22 -0500
I seem to recall seeing an ISO specification (or draft specification) for
soft proofing that calls for a recommended luminance of 100 cd/m2. Does
anyone know of this specification?
Does anyone follow it?
If that is the right number for soft proofing, should it not be the right
number for both CRTs and LCDs?
Does the ability of LCDs to take us to much higher levels mean that we
should go there?
So many questions...
Tom Orino
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>
From: email@hidden
>
Reply-To: email@hidden
>
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 12:20:04 -0800 (PST)
>
To: email@hidden
>
Subject: colorsync-users digest, Vol 3 #67 - 16 msgs
>
>
> I recently received my
>
> LCD Spyder
>
> & OptiCal upgrade & found it unable to deal with any "brightness"
>
> setting lower than
>
> .60 on my 17" LCD Studio Display.
>
>
The 17" display is even brighter than the 22, it offers luminance readings as
>
high as 300 can/sq.m!
_______________________________________________
colorsync-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/colorsync-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.