• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: which makes better monitor profiles?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: which makes better monitor profiles?


  • Subject: Re: which makes better monitor profiles?
  • From: "jmassman" <email@hidden>
  • Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 15:39:24 -0500

Both build reasonable profiles. OptiCAL has more advanced features and
> controls, builds profiles with more open shandows, and costs less, so I
don't
> see a lot of direct competition in my markets.
>
> C. David Tobie
> Design Cooperative


C. David:

Your post leads me to believe that OptiCAL builds a better profile than
PhotoCAL. True? You were really addressing the difference between the
ColorVision product and a competitor so I'm putting words in your mouth here
so could you clarify the difference between PhotoCAL and OptiCAL? Even the
ColorVision web site is pretty fuzzy on the differences between the two
packages. Have you found any difference between a PhotoCAL profile and a
OptiCAL profile?

John Massman
_______________________________________________
colorsync-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/colorsync-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.

References: 
 >Re: which makes better monitor profiles? (From: email@hidden)

  • Prev by Date: Re: i1-color control
  • Next by Date: RE: Epson 5000 calibration question
  • Previous by thread: Re: which makes better monitor profiles?
  • Next by thread: Re: which makes better monitor profiles?
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread