• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Spectrocam and Spectrophotometers vs. Colorimeters (was Portable Spectrophotometers)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Spectrocam and Spectrophotometers vs. Colorimeters (was Portable Spectrophotometers)


  • Subject: Re: Spectrocam and Spectrophotometers vs. Colorimeters (was Portable Spectrophotometers)
  • From: email@hidden
  • Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 09:20:17 EST

In a message dated 2/14/02 6:35:09 PM, email@hidden writes:

Do you know much about the patch recognition it
>uses. The EyeOne requires a large contrast/difference between adjacent
>patches for it to recognize where one starts and the other finishes. Do
>you
>know if the Spectrocam works in the same way?

The SpectroCam in scan mode needs contrast or narrow contrasting bars between
patches, and will read anything formatted for the EyeOne or the DTP41.


C. David Tobie
Design Cooperative
email@hidden
_______________________________________________
colorsync-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/colorsync-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.

  • Prev by Date: Re: An unsolicited plug for Monaco.
  • Next by Date: Re: An unsolicited plug for Monaco.
  • Previous by thread: re: An unsolicited plug for Monaco.
  • Next by thread: Re: colorsync-users digest, Vol 3 #68 - 16 msgs
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread