Re: 2200 to the Rescue!
Re: 2200 to the Rescue!
- Subject: Re: 2200 to the Rescue!
- From: email@hidden (Anthony Sanna)
- Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2002 23:44:53 -0500
>
I'm not Andrew, but like him
I'm glad you cleared that up for us Bruce. I'm not Andrew either, and
sort of like the kid myself. He grows on you after a while, wouldn't you
say?
>
It's still an RGB black box, so don't expect miracles, but the papers
>
I've profiled so far haven't been difficult (Archival/Enhanced Matte
>
and Premium SemiGloss.) It's a big step up from the 1280.
So same interface then, eh? Have you been profiling it with NCA? For a
while there, all sorts of profiling suggestions were being bandied about
using PhotoEnhance or Vivid or some other driver setting. Joe Holmes'
post on Monday, however, blew some of the wind out of that sail for me
when he stated that some of these settings (PhotoEnhance and Auto, I
believe) were changing the separation process based on a subjective
software analysis of the image. But if the 2200 is an easier printer to
profile and exhibits minimal metamerism, then it sounds like a good swap
to me.
Tony
PS: Everyone who isn't Andrew, but likes him anyway, please raise your
hand.
Anthony R. Sanna
Vice-President
SACO Foods, Inc.
6120 University Avenue
Middleton, Wisconsin 53562 USA
email@hidden
www.sacofoods.com
1-800-373-7226
(608) 238-9101
(608) 238-8149 - fax
_______________________________________________
colorsync-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/colorsync-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.