Re: Matchlock protection schemes
Re: Matchlock protection schemes
- Subject: Re: Matchlock protection schemes
- From: JWL <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 29 May 2002 22:12:23 -0700
Not to beat this thread into the ground, but...
I'm alarmed at the thought of anyone endorsing hardware dongles. I think
that's a terrible message to send to developers.
As a 'user', I bitterly resent the way a dongle puts the entire onus on me -
any problem is my responsibility - despite having purchased the product.
Geez, think back to that long thread about upgrading a USB dongle to run the
upgrade of (was it ProfileMaker Pro? I forgot...), then when the user had an
issue with the upgrade, the older version dongle no longer worked, and... it
seemed to go on & on ...some long tortured journey.
And no user would ever have any other devices to put on their USB bus, so no
worry about potential conflicts, right.....Not!
Of course developers can & should protect their products. But there are
effective serialization schemes that are far less user hostile. I'm not real
fond of Web-based techniques, but *anything* beats the nuisance of a dongle.
Matchlock, in principle, is OK with me. Seems like it requires attention
from the developer's side as well, tho - the user shouldn't be left waiting
3 or 4 days for a match phrase to get emailed back from the company.
-- my 2 cents
John
Andrew Rodney <email@hidden> wrote:
>
on 5/28/02 6:35 PM, Tom Beckenham at email@hidden wrote:
>
>
> I've been following this thread, as I've been looking at ways to protect our
>
> own software. I can't believe so many people prefer dongles. Most of our
>
> users hate dongles.
>
>
Don't get me wrong, I do HATE Dongles. I just hate Matchlock more...
_______________________________________________
colorsync-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/colorsync-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.