Re: scanback profiling question
Re: scanback profiling question
- Subject: Re: scanback profiling question
- From: tom vanderlinden <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 23:44:23 -0400
good evening - - -
Here is a quote I saved from Bruce Fraser,
which he posted 4-5Aug01 to the ColorSync list,
which seem to address the question:
>
> After we apply the camera profile to the Betterlight capture, when we
>
> go to a
>
> working space in Photoshop, we generally do this with the Perceptual
>
> intent.
>
Is it really applying perceptual or is it a tag to the relative intent?
>
I'm still wondering which profilers are correctly using the
>
tables/tags.
The quote is:
Conversions to working space are always RelCol or AbsCol.
The rendering intent is always dictated by the target profile
the conversion from source to PCS is always RelCol
(unless you ask for Absolute Colorimetric)
and while working space profiles may say they have a perceptual intent,
they dont. If you choose Perceptual (or Saturation, for that matter)
youll get exactly the same result as you do when you choose RelCol
try it and see
Is this still true today?
- - - Tom Vanderlinden
printing for preservation
Is this On Monday, April 21, 2003, at 11:42 AM, neil snape wrote:
>
on 21/04/2003 16:56, Steve Agard wrote :
>
>
> After we apply the camera profile to the Betterlight capture, when we
>
> go to a
>
> working space in Photoshop, we generally do this with the Perceptual
>
> intent.
>
Is it really applying perceptual or is it a tag to the relative intent?
>
I'm still wondering which profilers are correctly using the
>
tables/tags.
>
>
Neil Snape email@hidden http://mapage.noos.fr/nsnape
>
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
colorsync-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/colorsync-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.