Re: Heavy posterization
Re: Heavy posterization
- Subject: Re: Heavy posterization
- From: Chris Murphy <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2003 11:15:34 -0600
On Wednesday, August 6, 2003, at 11:00 PM, gariba
<email@hidden> writes:
I will build other profile using Photorealistic as you suggests. About
this regard, since I'm using EyeOne, let me ask you: if I read the
patches one at once will I get a more accurate result than using the
strip rule?
No, if anything it's slightly more accurate because of the amount of
averaging that occurs per patch when in strip mode. The catch is that
it is possible to read the correct row of patches and for a misreading
to occur and not get warned about it. In that case, somewhere you'd
likely get severe posterization.
What I do as a rule is measure a target twice, and save the data set
and then use MeasureTool to do a comparison. Even if you are using Eye
One Match you can use MeasureTool for this purpose. If the comparison
indicates the sets are reasonably the same, then I use the average
feature in MeasureTool, then build a profile with that. Eye One Match
will let you load in an averaged data set.
Chris Murphy
Color Remedies (TM)
www.colorremedies.com/realworldcolor
---------------------------------------------------------
Co-author "Real World Color Management"
Published by PeachPit Press (ISBN 0-201-77340-6)
_______________________________________________
colorsync-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/colorsync-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.