RE: Camera Raw Plug-in
RE: Camera Raw Plug-in
- Subject: RE: Camera Raw Plug-in
- From: "Greg Remington" <email@hidden>
- Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2003 07:19:57 +0100
>
-----Original Message-----
>
[mailto:email@hidden]On Behalf Of
>
email@hidden
>
Since I know no one who views images with a spectrophotometer,
>
the idea that
>
numerical data is the only thing that is meaningful strikes me as...
>
simplistic.
>
C. David Tobie
>
Technical Editor
>
Photo Electronic Imaging magazine
>
www.peimag.com
>
Technical Editor
>
Professional Photographer magazine
>
www.ppmag.com
>
Technical Editor
>
Mastering Digital Printing: The Photographer's and Artist's Guide to
>
High-Quality Digital Output (authored by Harald Johnson)
If your only way to judge the difference between custom profiled images
produced using color targets and color science and an image processing
function in Photoshop is your eyes, then this thread should stop now.
I expect much more from the technical editor of any photo related
magazine, but perhaps this is not the forum for discussing this product
seriously and asking posters to decrease the emotional hype.
Any kind of objective test results would be welcome. "Looks great to
me", doesn't convince an old skeptic like myself :-)
The very most interesting aspect of ACR to me personally is whether ACR
can store completely unmodified sensor data from any camera. For those
that believe custom profiles will remain necessary for accurate color
work, the raw sensor data is the holy grail. Adobe would really have
provided a valuable service to everybody if this data can now be
easily accessed from a wide range of digital cameras.
Greg
_______________________________________________
colorsync-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/colorsync-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.