• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
RE: scanner profiles
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: scanner profiles


  • Subject: RE: scanner profiles
  • From: "CS Carl Stawicki (4211)" <email@hidden>
  • Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 09:22:45 -0500

I have a tiny 16x16 pixel RGB file that has all the neutral tones from 0-255
(one tone per pixel). I assign my new scanner profile to it, convert to Lab,
and check out the histogram. This shows me how the values get distributed in
the 'L' channel, and how many I loose. So the more evenly the neutral values
are distributed, and the less I loose, the better the scanner profile. The
'a-b' channels tell me how neutral, or not, the profile is. As far as
banding goes, if any part of the 'L' histogram shows a few spikes with a lot
of space between them, that indicates banding.

You could also convert this file from scanner to working space, and analyze
it the same way. (On a side note, this is one of the tests I performed to
learn about the advantages of a working space gamma of 2.2, versus something
lower.)

I also do visual tests alongside this. I scan a GATF photo (the fruit) at
the same time as the target and use it for visual analyzation. The numeric
evaluation explained above usually concurs with what this shows me, if a
problem (such as banding) is obvious enough.

If anyone's interested, I can email the 16x16px file to them to save them
the trouble of making it (it's pretty tedious). It's only a 1k tiff.

Carl.
email@hidden

> ----------
> From: Tyler Boley
> Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 9:29 PM
> To: email@hidden
> Subject: scanner profiles
>
> I am finding it difficult to objectively evaluate scanner profiles. I
> have a few IT8's w/ ref files, and a few methods of profile creation.
> They all give slightly different results. Other than subjective
> comparisons between transparencies and scans displayed on monitor, is
> there some more objective way to evaluate the profiles' quality?
> Looking at them in Colorthink is fun, but well, just fun.
> Beyond accuracy, my main problem is color banding.
> Thank you,
> Tyler
> _______________________________________________
> colorsync-users mailing list | email@hidden
> Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
> http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/colorsync-users
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
_______________________________________________
colorsync-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/colorsync-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.

  • Prev by Date: Re: What is a good RGB rip?
  • Next by Date: Re: HASP and OSX
  • Previous by thread: scanner profiles
  • Next by thread: What is a good RGB rip?
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread