Re: BEST v5
Re: BEST v5
- Subject: Re: BEST v5
- From: Graeme Gill <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2003 11:11:02 +1000
Roger Breton wrote:
>
Anyone seen the news on BEST v5? It is just stunning. I am speechless. Go
>
have a look at www.bestcolor.com
Doesn't look like much from my perspective [Which, admittedly, is that
of a competitor]. We've benchmarked CPSI vs. JAWS for instance in the past,
and CPSI was 2 to 3 x slower, so I doubt that moving to CPSI will do much
for BestColors performance (although I don't know how Ghostscript compares
to JAWS, speed wise). I guess for some people, being "the real thing" will
appeal, although I have doubts (based on past experience) about Adobes
commitment to CPSI. Moving from process to CIE measurements for calibration
also seems like a leap backwards. Density measurements are specifically
designed to be narrow band process controls, ideal for calibration. CIE
measurements are very broad band, and mean that you can't separate out
the individual channels behaviour very well if colorants are mixed, and
give you a poorer signal to noise ratio (higher measurement uncertainty)
when measuring individual colorants. From what I've seen, the EFI-CMM is
OK, but nothing to write home about.
Graeme Gill.
_______________________________________________
colorsync-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/colorsync-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
| References: | |
| | >BEST v5 (From: Roger Breton <email@hidden>) |