RE: RIP's for Photographers
RE: RIP's for Photographers
- Subject: RE: RIP's for Photographers
- From: "Darrian Young" <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2003 15:58:59 +0200
- Organization: Medios Graficos y Visuales
C. David Tobie wrote:
>
I've never understood why using the Epson screening is listed as a plus
with RIPs, when it would appear, from my angle, to be more of a minus.
>
Supporting the Epson functions, such as MicroWeave (at least on the devices
that support them at the printer level) is great, but there is a certain
>
inflexibility to using their predefined screens.
Can you be a bit more specific as to the limitations? I have yet to see a
better screening than Epson's on an Epson, and the results are great.
People often complain about the poor color quality of Epson's driver, but
not the print quality. So if you have an application that can add-on good
color management to the same screening, as well as speed, ease of use,
nesting, etc. I suppose that from some angle it may be a minus, but
fortunately, from where I am, I don't suffer the consequences.
Regards.
Darrian Young
MGV
_______________________________________________
colorsync-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/colorsync-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.