Re: Imageprint Question (Studio Print)
Re: Imageprint Question (Studio Print)
- Subject: Re: Imageprint Question (Studio Print)
- From: Sören <email@hidden>
- Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2004 00:54:22 +0100
- Importance: Normal
For information:
I use Studio Print 10 and I can put in any number I want to linearize each
channel. There is a default settings of 10, 20 and 40 but you can put in
anything number you want. You can also read it in the Studio Prints manual.
With the new version 11 you can get the new "ColorGPS" (ad another US$ 1700)
that is suppose to be "awesome"... would like to hear if someone been trying
it out and what they think about it.
I can also mention that many people (black and white photographers) prefer
my black and white prints with SP 10 and Epsons UC inks compare to the ones
that are printed from ImagePrint 5.6 - 6.0.
Regards
Soren
Message: 1
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 15:35:28 -0500
From: "Cris Daniels" <email@hidden>
Subject: Re: Imageprint Question
To: <email@hidden>
Message-ID: <000a01c4d8ae$76415a00$6401a8c0@graphics>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
If I remember correctly each channel in ImagePrint is linearized in at least
256 steps, but of course the whole process is more complicated than that.
All of these properties are rolled into the recipe which is part of the
individual driver. In Studioprint 10 you had the option to linearize each
channel with 10, 20, or 40 patches. This isn't enough sample points, and
using the same profiler (which takes that out of the equation) I was
consistently seeing smoother tonal transitions with ImagePrint, especially
in the highlights. If I sampled 40 patches for each channel with a
spectrolino and did no such thing with ImagePrint yet my output was still
smoother with ImagePrint,
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden