Re: Pulse
Re: Pulse
- Subject: Re: Pulse
- From: Richard Millott <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2004 11:21:16 +1100
At 14:49 27/12/2004 +0100, you wrote:
Well, it's certainly time GMB's S&M device had some competition that
is fun for the rest of us.
Does this posting mean that in spite of the purported low accuracy of
Pulse the profiles are good ?
Hi All
Sorry for the post, just sent, dated 1980.
Hi Edmund,
I cannot vouch for any low accuracy but from my limited testing the profile
quality is outstanding and I'm basing my assessment on real world prints
from files that I've previously had difficulties outputting when printing
through
other profiles.
And I have also found the ease of profiling procedure to be a no brainer.
If any
measuring errors are made the software will not let you proceed until correct
measurements have been made.
For me, output profiling has moved up a rung.
happy new year to all
Cheers
Richard
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden