• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Hi-Fi inksets
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Hi-Fi inksets


  • Subject: Re: Hi-Fi inksets
  • From: Robert L Krawitz <email@hidden>
  • Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2004 21:33:07 -0500

From: email@hidden
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2004 12:12:05 EST

Personally, I've found that 720 DPI on the 2200 often
produces *better* output than the higher resolutions.

I'd also like some clarification on this, as it certainly hasn't been my
experience.

The 2200 can use the same minimum drop size (4 pl) at 720, 1440x720,
and 2880x1440 DPI, which yields approximately the same highlight
smoothness. I've found that at higher resolutions there's more
placement error, which messes up the screen pattern a bit.

--
Robert Krawitz <email@hidden>

Tall Clubs International -- http://www.tall.org/ or 1-888-IM-TALL-2
Member of the League for Programming Freedom -- mail email@hidden
Project lead for Gimp Print -- http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net

"Linux doesn't dictate how I work, I dictate how Linux works."
--Eric Crampton
_______________________________________________
colorsync-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/colorsync-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Hi-Fi inksets
      • From: Graeme Gill <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: Hi-Fi inksets (From: email@hidden)

  • Prev by Date: GretagMacbeth Eye One
  • Next by Date: pc vs mac
  • Previous by thread: Re: Hi-Fi inksets
  • Next by thread: Re: Hi-Fi inksets
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread