• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: dot gain - still more
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: dot gain - still more


  • Subject: Re: dot gain - still more
  • From: Roger Breton <email@hidden>
  • Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2004 07:48:43 -0500

> You would still need to know solid densities (I didn't see any
> equations on Bruce's site for this because I suspect it can't be done) and
> trap wouldn't hurt either.

> Marc Levine

I was thinking about this very point, how to derive the SID from a Lab value
in a profile. I was thinking that this could be done plain empirically by
comparing some existing printed patches of solid. I think the hue doesn't
realy matter here because all we're after a log reflectance? So if I take
TR-001 100% cyan which is L*=56 then it's just a matter of going through my
litho printed samples of 100% cyan and find the one that yields an L* of
about that value and read its corresponding density. Would that be valid? As
a matter of fact couldn't one find a statistical relationship between L* and
Optical Density? It may not be linear but I'm sure it would have a high R2.

Regards,

Roger Breton | Laval, Canada | email@hidden
http://pages.infinit.net/graxx
_______________________________________________
colorsync-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/colorsync-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: dot gain - still more
      • From: Graeme Gill <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: dot gain - still more (From: Marc Levine <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Hi-Fi inksets
  • Next by Date: Re: Color Burst RIP
  • Previous by thread: Re: dot gain - still more
  • Next by thread: Re: dot gain - still more
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread