Re: Artisan calibration/soft proof workflow
Re: Artisan calibration/soft proof workflow
- Subject: Re: Artisan calibration/soft proof workflow
- From: Richard Kenward <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2004 21:51:17 +0000
In message Mon, 5 Jan 2004, Chris Murphy writes
On Jan 5, 2004, at 12:49 PM, Richard Kenward wrote:
And then if consistency of dynamic range is important to you
(consistent contrast), and having a "digital original" that is reliable
over time then there isn't a comparison to an Artisan.
Dear Chris
Many thanks for your on the ball observations .....I want it all
unfortunately!
And also I wonder how today's colorimeters will perform with a new
phosphor set, as colorimeters are made assuming a particular phosphor
set (or average of them), the exception being the DTP92/94 from XRite
which uses a different set of assumptions. In any event, the point here
is that you may need an emissive spectrophotometer or new colorimeters
that take such a drastically different phosphor set into account, in
order to calibrate and profile such a thing.
Very good point! As a delighted long time user of the X-rite DTP 92
and Optical in what way would this calibrator be better or worse suited
to an improved phosphor set?
Has anyone worked with this monitor yet? I know it's not yet available
in the U.S. but maybe someone in Japan can let us know how they are
calibrating/profiling this display and how well it's working out.
Chris Murphy
Must be someone by now <G>
Cheers
Richard
--
Richard Kenward
_______________________________________________
colorsync-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/colorsync-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.