Re: ProPhoto RGB or Adobe RGB 1998 or ...
Re: ProPhoto RGB or Adobe RGB 1998 or ...
- Subject: Re: ProPhoto RGB or Adobe RGB 1998 or ...
- From: bruce fraser <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 15:24:50 -0800
Kodak actually hired me to do a lot of testing on ProPhoto back when
it was still known as ROMM RGB, and after torturing it, I found that
I really liked the way it worked. Mainly I like being sure that my
choice of working space absolutely will not produce any clipping!
I've had no issues going from ProPhoto to output spaces that I
wouldn't also have had using any other space. The only other working
space I'm likely to convert to is sRGB for web delivery.
Bruce
At 8:44 AM -0700 1/12/04, Richard Wagner wrote:
David, Rik and Bruce,
What was your rationale for going with ProPhoto RGB? Was the
decision based primarily on Lab gamut efficiency?
Any issues in later converting from 16 bit, gamma 1.8 (ProPhoto RGB)
to 8 bit, gamma 2.2 (e.g., AdobeRGB or another output profile)?
--
email@hidden
_______________________________________________
colorsync-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/colorsync-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.