RE: ProfileMaker 4
RE: ProfileMaker 4
- Subject: RE: ProfileMaker 4
- From: Steve Upton <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 15:21:44 -0800
At 4:16 PM -0600 1/21/04, Broudy, David wrote:
>
> -----Original Message-----
>
> From: Andrew Rodney [mailto:email@hidden]
>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2004 11:51 AM
>
> To: Charlie Rieger; ColorSync Mailing List
>
> Subject: Re: ProfileMaker 4
>
>
>
> You DO want to save spectral data (that's the default in the
>
> ProfileMaker
>
> module but you need to set it in NeasureTool). I don't know
>
> that there is
>
> any speed hit. If you don't get spectral data, you can't alter the
>
>
I've never timed it but measuring spectral data w/a spectroscan subjectively
>
feels like it takes almost 2x as long as not.
Are you sure there's not some filter involved as well? We switched to spectral measuring in all our profiling building quite a while ago and I did not notice any time difference w/ any of our tables... I'm sure I would have noticed a 2x difference.
Regards,
Steve
________________________________________________________________________
o Steve Upton CHROMiX www.chromix.com
o (hueman) 866.CHROMiX
o email@hidden 206.985.6837
o ColorGear ColorThink ColorValet ColorSmarts ProfileCentral
________________________________________________________________________
--
_______________________________________________
colorsync-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/colorsync-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.