• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Who's right?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Who's right?


  • Subject: Re: Who's right?
  • From: Andre Schützenhofer <email@hidden>
  • Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2004 14:23:28 +0200

Am 07.06.2004 um 05:31 schrieb Graeme Gill:

Note that there are many ways of remapping luminance ranges (it's a sub set
of gamut mapping, so many approaches are possible). A simple approach is to
linearly map the luminance range. Another might be to do it non-linearly,
compressing highlights and shadows more than the middle range. It may
well be premature to standardize such a thing (at least as a "one and only"
way of doing things).

Basically, the decision between linear mapping or non-linear mapping and the way of doing it should depend on the gamuts involved in one / this particular transformation. The current approach of BPC is to map L* linearly - or, more precisely: After determining the Black Points, they are scaled to zero and mapping happens linearly on L (White Point is relative anyway), regardless of the real 'sizes' of Ls. Consequentially, best results will be achieved if the determined Black Points do not differ too much.

In other cases, e.g. if we map L*= 0 to L*= 17, linear compression of L will be perceived in shadows more than in midtones, quaters or highlights. (Virtually, there is no loss because of scaling the BP to ideal black. So for the sense of the transformation, mapping happens on the full dynamic range of L*.) The issue here is that this may happen to colorspaces with Black Points far from absolute black.

So, one possible solution might be to examine the distance between source and destination black point, which is basis for the 'strength' of a non-linear L mapping. Method of mapping is result of the correlation between the black points, determined by examination of how to compress L* full-dynamic to limited dynamic. Clear defintion of perception is the equal-distance of distinguishable gray-steps, which might be standardizeable (similar to LAB itself). The strength dynamically increases or decreases equal to the distance between black points.

Regards, Andre Sch|tzenhofer
_______________________________________________
colorsync-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/colorsync-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.


References: 
 >Re: Who's right? (From: neil snape <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Who's right? (From: Chris Murphy <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Who's right? (From: Graeme Gill <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: RE: Buy Artisan Direct from Sony?
  • Next by Date: Re: Who's right?
  • Previous by thread: Re: Who's right?
  • Next by thread: Re: Who's right? I stopped trying to figure out
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread