• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: LaCie, Blue Eye and luminance value
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: LaCie, Blue Eye and luminance value


  • Subject: Re: LaCie, Blue Eye and luminance value
  • From: "amadou diallo" <email@hidden>
  • Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 07:13:44 -0400

Set at D65 with a 2.2 gamma, I'm getting a 91.46 luminance value after calibration. I'm not sure how to determine a "black bias of .2-.3". How do I check this?


&gt;From: neil snape &lt;email@hidden&gt;
&gt;To: amadou diallo &lt;email@hidden&gt;, &lt;email@hidden&gt;
&gt;Subject: Re: LaCie, Blue Eye and luminance value
&gt;Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 06:39:50 +0200
&gt;
&gt;on 10/06/2004 6:15, amadou diallo wrote :
&gt;
&gt; &gt; Does anyone the unit of measure for the &quot;luminance&quot; value the Blue Eye
&gt; &gt; software gives after calibration? Is it lamberts? I'm trying to get a feel
&gt; &gt; for how much life the CRT has left. Gradients still look good, but as the
&gt; &gt; guns deteriorate I figure the luminance (set to maximum in the software)
&gt; &gt; will gradually decline. How low can the luminance value, as reported in Blue
&gt; &gt; Eye, reach before it's time for a new monitor?
&gt;
&gt;It's a bit more complicated than that. The black point setting greatly
&gt;influences the maximum attainable white balance and luminosity. What this
&gt;says is that as the monitor ages you can increase the relative luminosity by
&gt;having a weaker black. This is a reduced range and possibly the gamma will
&gt;start to become quite non-linear. What I have seen in aged monitors are a
&gt;changed hue angle of the chromocities that affect saturated colors even with
&gt;the best calibrations and profiling. That said an old monitor may be
&gt;acceptable for lower gamut imaging that fits within the aged phosphor set.
&gt;Not ideal but still usable.
&gt;Blue Eye X shows candela/square metre cd/m2 and the results are of
&gt;course subject to your presets. At D65 you'll get up to +120 cd/m2 on a new
&gt;monitor. If you make a reasonable preset you should maintain a 85cd/m2 L
&gt;with a black bias of around 0.2-0.3 for many years without problems on a
&gt;22&quot;.
&gt;
&gt;Neil Snape nsnape @ noos.fr neil_snape @ mac.com
&gt;http://mapage.noos.fr/nsnape
&gt;_______________________________________________
&gt;colorsync-users mailing list | email@hidden
&gt;Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/colorsync-users
&gt;Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
&gt;

_________________________________________________________________
Stop worrying about overloading your inbox - get MSN Hotmail Extra Storage! http://join.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200362ave/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
colorsync-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/colorsync-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: LaCie, Blue Eye and luminance value
      • From: neil snape <email@hidden>
  • Prev by Date: Re: LaCie, Blue Eye and luminance value
  • Next by Date: Re: LaCie, Blue Eye and luminance value
  • Previous by thread: Re: LaCie, Blue Eye and luminance value
  • Next by thread: Re: LaCie, Blue Eye and luminance value
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread