• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Questions about the UI at 1.8 gamma
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Questions about the UI at 1.8 gamma


  • Subject: Re: Questions about the UI at 1.8 gamma
  • From: bruce fraser <email@hidden>
  • Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 13:47:01 -0700

At 12:53 PM -0700 6/21/04, John Zimmerer wrote:
In fact, I'd like the rest of the list to respond with whether their viewing conditions meet the ISO recommendations. You don't have to make a very detailed response, a simple "my environment is brighter" or "I work like that" would suffice. For copyright reasons, you'll need to obtain the spec yourselves to get the full set of recommendations, but others have already offered the 32 lux recommendation from the spec.


Ambient at monitor face - 7 lux

Ambient at eyeball level - 34 lux

For a little context, this is a room with a fairly large southeast-facing window, covered with a regular venetian blind. It's far from being a cave-I used to do that back when displays maxed out at 85cd/m2. The monitor has a hood, and is approximately 12 feet from, and perpendicular to, the window. Above readings taken around 1PM on a bright overcast day. Direct sun on the window would raise the ambient level a bit (I'd guess around 15 lux) but has no effect at the monitor face-I've measured that in the past with daytime results that are invariably between 6 and 8 lux.

For room illumination, I have three 50W Solux 4700K 360 spots. When they're all turned on, the ambient at my working position is around 75 lux, but I rarely have them all turned on when I'm actually working at the computer. 200 lux is a really bright fully-cranked office fluorescent scenario. If that's the condition to which you want to tailor OS-level color management, I suggest you focus your energies on a solution for the severe metameric mismatch between office color printers profiled at D50 and office color prints viewed under Cool White Fluorescents...

Sorry, that was sarcastic. What I really mean to say is that in my humble opinion, you need to make sure that you have things working in a way that satisfies the needs of those who actually care about, monitor, measure, and charge for or pay for accurate color before you go off and solve all the world's color management problems automatically.

--
email@hidden
_______________________________________________
colorsync-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/colorsync-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Questions about the UI at 1.8 gamma
      • From: John Zimmerer <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: Questions about the UI at 1.8 gamma (From: Roger Breton <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Questions about the UI at 1.8 gamma (From: John Zimmerer <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: colorsync-users digest, Vol 3 #1415 - 9 msgs
  • Next by Date: Gimp-Print and Stylus Pro 7500
  • Previous by thread: Re: Questions about the UI at 1.8 gamma
  • Next by thread: Re: Questions about the UI at 1.8 gamma
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread