Re: Supplied RGB
Re: Supplied RGB
- Subject: Re: Supplied RGB
- From: Andrew Rodney <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 07:51:28 -0600
on 5/26/04 7:41 AM, Ulf Skogsbergh wrote:
>
As a photographer I like the idea that the prepress professionals
>
handle the conversions and that they work from RGB. My experience is
>
that I can never get any information, so that i can do the conversions
>
properly.
I wonder why <g>. It's not in their best interest and having the creator of
the image handle the conversions seems to be hearsay. I on the other hand
like to see Photographers who wish to control the process (and charge for
it) have the ability to do this. Yes getting the information is often like
getting blood from a rock. If you know who's going to produce the contract
proof, a target sent, measured and a custom profile built usually results in
conversions that are superior and allow the photographer control and profits
(as well as allowing those useful cross rendered prints on the desktop Epson
in the studio).
>
Also nobody wants to pay me for that work.
Ah, that's a big problem (but not one based upon technology). A photographer
can produce a CMYK conversion as good (and I'd say based on their ability to
judge the color of their own images, better) than a great deal of print
houses.
The JPEG part is pretty scary to me.
>
Someone like you, Andrew, should be part of it !
What's it pay? <g>
Andrew Rodney
http://digitaldog.imagingrevue.com/
_______________________________________________
colorsync-users mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/colorsync-users
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.