• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Real world experience w/ GMG and Oris RIPs
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Real world experience w/ GMG and Oris RIPs


  • Subject: Re: Real world experience w/ GMG and Oris RIPs
  • From: "Mike Eddington" <email@hidden>
  • Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 13:53:55 -0500
  • Importance: Normal

Title: Message
<I am looking into purchasing a third party rip for an Epson 10600. I have narrowed it down to two: GMG and Oris. I was wondering if anyone had some real world experience with these rips that could give me some pros and cons to each one especially in the area of color management. I will be using this rip in conjunction with Rampage 8.6. Any information would be greatly appreciated.>
 
I not very familiar with Oris, although it appears to be similar to GMG in many aspects. We've been using GMG Colorproof for several years. The major benefits to most other Rips as I see them are GMG's proprietary profiling process is iterative, each measurement cycle lowering the delta E between the target and actual Lab values until it is within a user specified delta E value or it can no longer be lowered. If you look at the IPA Proofing Round Up results, you'll see they took 1st place(colorimetric)with an average delta E of .89 compared to DTR004 (Oris took second). I have done this myself and gotten a delta E of .64 and could probably go lower by using GMG's own paper. This is all accomplished without the need for third party software (ProfileMaker, ect).
 
Keeping the printer linearized and calibrated through GMG is very easy. Print and measure a chart...if your average or max delta E is a out of tolerance, perform a quick calculation and repeat. As Terry Wise pointed out in a previous post, this is based on colorimtery rather than density measurements, which is how Oris does this (I believe).  
 
One other benefit that I see in the most recent version of GMG Colorproof is the ability to perform cleaning cycles and print Nozzle patterns from the Rip, as well as schedule them after x number of jobs. On the surface this might not seem to be that big a deal, but if you have a number of remote Epson printers as we do, nozzles clogs quickly become a major issue.
 
The software can be a little complicated, but the support guys have always bent over backwards for us with any problems we've encountered. Most of the problems we have had were between the keyboard and the chair, but there have been issues with the Rip that I'm told have been addressed in the current version. 
 
mike   
 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Real world experience w/ GMG and Oris RIPs
      • From: Graeme Gill <email@hidden>
  • Prev by Date: RE: Display Gamma: Factory vs calibration vs working space
  • Next by Date: Re: Real world experience w/ GMG and Oris RIPs
  • Previous by thread: Re: Real world experience w/ GMG and Oris RIPs
  • Next by thread: Re: Real world experience w/ GMG and Oris RIPs
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread