Re: Real world experience w/ GMG and Oris RIPs
Re: Real world experience w/ GMG and Oris RIPs
- Subject: Re: Real world experience w/ GMG and Oris RIPs
- From: Roger Breton <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 11:39:42 -0500
> But I believe, as Graeme pointed out, that the "secret sauce" is more in the
> underlying model (which would reflect in the interpolation algorithm) than
> in the iteration. And also in the fact that usage of link profiles, by
> interpolating in the same space of the end result (CMYK in this case), can
> increase the fitness of the interpolation algorithm compared to
> interpolating in an intermediary space (Lab or XYZ) which has different
> properties.
>
> -- Roberto Michelena
Actually, this idea of an underlying model is what surely permeates the
better profiling package (me speculating, here). Case in point, PrintOpen.
The latest version I use to build press profiles from has a unique Correct
Measurement Data feature which I have not seen in any other profiling
package to date. It does wonders on targets that have suffered uneven
inking, you know, because of density variation across the sheet.
This feature may not be construed as iterative. It is not, in fact. But I
thought it had some bearing on the discussion as we touch on different
algorithmic approach to profiling.
Regards,
Roger Breton | Laval, Canada | email@hidden
http://pages.infinit.net/graxx
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden