• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Linear histogram
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Linear histogram


  • Subject: Re: Linear histogram
  • From: bruce fraser <email@hidden>
  • Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2005 15:59:45 -0800

Title: Re: Linear histogram
At 5:45 PM -0500 4/1/05, eugene appert wrote:
 
Just a question out of curiosity, I cant figure out why the histogram of raw capture that has been preserved in linear gamma gets bunched to the left. I think I have understood what linear gamma means and why far more bits are required to quantify highlights than shadows. What I don’t understand is why that translates as more abundant representation of the shadow levels.  I know its not a big deal but I ‘m thinking if I don’t get this what else I am I missing?

Many more pixels in the image represent things that aren't highlights than represent things that are?

These aren't shadow levels, they're midtones and three-quarter-tones. In gamma 1.0, the nominal midtone is at about level 50.
--
email@hidden
 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

References: 
 >Linear histogram (From: "eugene appert" <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Linear histogram
  • Next by Date: Re: BVDM book
  • Previous by thread: Linear histogram
  • Next by thread: Re: linear Histogram
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread