Re: Documentation on proofing systems
Re: Documentation on proofing systems
- Subject: Re: Documentation on proofing systems
- From: daniel westcott <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 15:41:48 -0400
This really goes to the question of people forgetting what the proof is. It
is a contract on color reproduction. A somewhat imprecise one in that it was
not possible to adapt easily to different stocks. Still, the old methodology
of pulling a proof from film was the best that was available for the old
workflow. And yes, it showed dot marvelously and was usually hittable on
press-although not every problem showed up. Now that we have improved the
workflow by going direct to plate, and we have devised printing
methodologies (inkjet) that can simulate many different scenarios, the old
methodology is no longer the best available.
With this digital age of lithography comes new proofing methods...it is part
of the manufacturing world getting more efficient.
Tell them a conventional contract proof is 'so last century'.
Kind Regards,
Daniel S. Westcott
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden