• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
L* versus rods
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

L* versus rods


  • Subject: L* versus rods
  • From: "eugene appert" <email@hidden>
  • Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2005 17:28:39 -0500

Hello,

 

Are there a finite number of points along the L* axis that correspond to the eye’s ability to distinguish variations in luminance?

 

In other words, is it possible for a colour management system which uses the CIE Lab model as a connection space, to encode values beyond the human eye/brain’s ability to perceive?

 

I am asking this question not simply because I occasionally read comments like “ProPhoto contains colours beyond human perception” but also because of the distinctions of colour and tone implicit in a 16 bit/channel file.

 

I don’t understand how there can be L* values for luminance variations that the eye cannot see. Is L*24,344 a synthetic concoction or was it derived mathematically from the original “standard observer” of 1931?

 

Can humans really perceive such slight variations in density,  and if not,  how can there be lab values for such distinctions?

 

Thank you for any help understanding this.

 

Eugene Appert

 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: L* versus rods
      • From: Nathan Duran <email@hidden>
  • Prev by Date: Re: RGB to ISO CMYK: www.ifra.com
  • Next by Date: Re: L* versus rods
  • Previous by thread: Re: RGB to ISO CMYK: www.ifra.com
  • Next by thread: Re: L* versus rods
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread