RE: Pro Photo RGB vs Adobe 98 RGB
RE: Pro Photo RGB vs Adobe 98 RGB
- Subject: RE: Pro Photo RGB vs Adobe 98 RGB
- From: bruce fraser <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 17:30:41 -0800
At 12:24 AM +0000 12/14/05, Richard wrote:
There are no immediate benefits because you cannot reproduce them on either
screen or paper.
I think you're wrong on two counts.
First, there's a significant range of colors that are reproducible on
inkjet, and to a somewhat lesser extent on press, that Adobe RGB
clips, in both the yellow-orange range and in darker greens.
Second, and much more important, if you clip the gamut on the raw
conversion, you turn what would otherwise be gradations into solid
blobs of color. They may look OK on the initial conversion, but they
jump out at you if you try any hue/sat tweaks post-conversion. I'm
not talking some esoteric "big color" concern here either-I see this
very often on foliage colors, particularly the darker ones.
If you maintain those gradations, you can control how they get mapped
into print space. If you turn them into blobs, they'll be blobs
forever.
--
email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden