Re: Finger Printing Press with Aqueous Coating
Re: Finger Printing Press with Aqueous Coating
- Subject: Re: Finger Printing Press with Aqueous Coating
- From: Don Hutcheson <email@hidden>
- Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 12:52:50 -0400
Steve,
If you normally run with coating then you should do all the press
calibration and profiling with coating too. In fact that's how we are doing
this year's GRACoL testing, for the simple reason that more commercial
printing is coated than not, and it's vastly easier to control trapping and
dry-back with the coater on.
Regards,
Don
******************************
Don Hutcheson, GRACoL chair
Hutcheson Consulting
E-mail: email@hidden
******************************
On 7/23/05 2:32 Steve Lehning <email@hidden> wrote:
> Message: 13
> Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 21:39:00 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Steve Lehning <email@hidden>
> Subject: Finger Printing Press with Aqueous Coating
> To: email@hidden
> Message-ID: <email@hidden>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
>
> Just wanted an opinion from some of the geurus out
> there.
> We are going to be running some press tests on our
> presses to come up with plate curves for GRACol dot
> gain standards. On our higher end number 1 and number
> 2 stocks we run a vast majority of our work with
> Aqueous coating. We have a debate going on as to if we
> should run these test with Aqueous coating or not. We
> have had jobs depending, on the stock that the Aqueous
> coating shifts color on us which causes some grief
> amoungst the sales staff. So the question arises does
> Aqueous coating change the dot structure and gain
> enough to configure this into our equation when
> analyzing data from the press.
>
> Steve Lehning
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden