Re: Haxachrome gamut shape
Re: Haxachrome gamut shape
- Subject: Re: Haxachrome gamut shape
- From: Roger Breton <email@hidden>
- Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2005 13:22:22 -0500
Graeme Gill wrote:
> It depends a bit on which gamut you are talking about, the actual
> raw device gamut, or the gamut that is reachable using the B2A table
> of a profile.
Please excuse my ignorance but I did not suspecct that there could be a
difference between the two? Can the same be said for CMYK "raw" vs
"reachable" device gamut?
> They are probably not the same thing. The raw gamut
> of something like a Roland CMYKOGcm printer is like nothing else
> you've ever seen.
Well, I'd really like to see one.
> I would suspect that the gamut you can reach
> using a profile made for such a device is rather smaller, and
> differently shaped.
Why the difference is beyond me? Are Hexachrome gamuts fundamentally
different from CMYK or CcMmYk gamuts? Isn't it "just" a matter of inverting
the A2B table?
> Graeme Gill.
Roger Breton | Laval, Canada | email@hidden
http://pages.infinit.net/graxx
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden