Re: camera raw and input profiles
Re: camera raw and input profiles
- Subject: Re: camera raw and input profiles
- From: email@hidden
- Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 13:42:28 -0500
Some RAW converters (Fuji f.ex.) have B&W as an option and my
experience is that it produces
a very pretty B&W file. More attractive than B&W conversion later in a
workflow.
I was wondering if not converting to color actually increases the
actual resolution then, since you are saying all the pixels are
actually grayscale ?
and
are we in agreement that profiling digital cameras is not as effective
in reality as profiling displays and printers .... ?
and would it be plausible to profile each set-up for photography, for
an applications that will read these profiles,
providing no changes in lighting or other conditions occur ? I'm
thinking of something less interpretive
like a copy set-up.
thanks
Ulf
On Friday, March 25, 2005, at 01:11 PM, bruce fraser wrote:
the effect of the CFA is certainly imposed on the grayscale pixels,
but the pixels themselves are just grayscale pixels.
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden