• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: GRACoL densities
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: GRACoL densities


  • Subject: Re: GRACoL densities
  • From: Terry Wyse <email@hidden>
  • Date: Sun, 1 May 2005 08:53:41 -0400

I concur with Ray. I did a press profiling job a few months ago where I had access to an X-Rite ATS scanning spectro unit. We did the run to GRACoL SIDs and I scanned/measured the color bars wet and then every couple of hours for 24 hours after that. With THAT ink set we saw cyan drop about .07 and the magenta only about .03. Black dropped nearly .15. We then changed ink sets and ran the test again (same stock). THIS time the CMY only dropped about .03 and the black about .07-.10. So it varies depending on ink at least.

Since it's really not practical to wait a couple of hours to find what the dry-back is, I simply run the SID about .03-.05 high. What I REALLY watch while running is a set of gray balance targets to make sure the densities are in BALANCE. I find that as long as the densities are within about .10 of the target but that they are in balance with each other (all a bit high or a bit low), I'll get good results. As far as the black, I'll have the pressmen run the black as high as they are comfortable with (typically 1.80-2.00) while keeping an eye on print contrast to make sure it doesn't get out of hand.

Beware of the instrument you're using also! I've run into several shops lately using polarized densitometers (typically Gretag D19C w/ Status T/P filters). Cyan and magenta will typically read .10-.15 higher with the POL filter while yellow will be pretty close. Black on the other hand can easily read .25-.35 higher or more! Because of this, I insist on using my Gretag SpectroEye (Status T, no filter) during the press run and then back into the numbers they should be using with their polarized unit later. I've also found that X-Rite 500 series spectro-densitometers will read about .10 higher than my SpectroEye even without polarization. Personally, I think inter-instrument (or inter-vendor?) agreement is the industry's dirty little secret. I've even been to shops that have a mix of Gretag and X-Rite units of different vintages (X-Rite 528 and older 408s for example or perhaps a SpectroEye and D19C) and NONE of the units will agree within .05 of each other even after careful calibration. So, for better or worse, my SpectroEye becomes the reference unit at least while I'm on-site. Since my SpectroEye TENDS to read lower compared to other instruments, I'm at least confident that, even after dryback, we'll have densities that are pretty close to the targets as measured by other instruments.

Later,
Terry


On Apr 26, 2005, at 12:17 PM, Ray Maxwell wrote:

 Hi Roger,

In my experience it varies with press, ink, and paper.  You have to do wet measurements and then measure again dry.  You then calculate your own wet target densities or dryback.

 "Your mileage may vary."

 Ray


Roger Breton wrote:
Ray,


Are you double sure it's dry?

Never mind, Ray. I just found the reference at the bottom of page S2 of the
v6.0 2002 book : "Ink density are dry". But then they add: "Dryback values
are included". What do they mean by that?


Take Grades #1 & #2 in that table on page S2. Under Solid Density, they have
1.70 for the black. Black density, I found, drops the most when it dries. So
in order to achieve 1.7 dry one has to aim for 1.8 or more wet. But I fail
to see what "dryback values are included" could possibly mean in this
context? The old SHoPS GATF study included tables for dryback but there is
nothing like that here.


Roger Breton  |  Laval, Canada  |  email@hidden
http://pages.infinit.net/graxx




_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
email@hidden


This email sent to email@hidden
_____________________________
WyseConsul
Color Management Consulting
email@hidden
704.843.0858
http://www.colormanagementgroup.com
http://www.wyseconsul.com (coming soon)


_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: This email sent to email@hidden
  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: GRACoL densities
      • From: Roger Breton <email@hidden>
  • Prev by Date: Re: Colorsync-users Digest, Vol 2, Issue 171
  • Next by Date: Re: Help with iCColor error with Win XP-2003
  • Previous by thread: Re: MS PDF ..and some info about Nec 2180WG
  • Next by thread: Re: GRACoL densities
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread