Lists

Open Menu Close Menu

Terms and Conditions
Lists hosted on this site
Email the Postmaster
Tips for posting to public mailing lists

Re: GRACoL densities

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: GRACoL densities

Subject: Re: GRACoL densities
From: Rich Apollo <email@hidden>
Date: Tue, 3 May 2005 07:42:10 -0500

On May 2, 2005, at 4:19 PM, email@hidden wrote:

Why are they using polarization in NorthAmerica is beyond me: polarized
filtering is *not* a Status T specifcation, pounds David McDowell.

<x-tad-smaller>

1) It's the only way to measure densities of opaque whites, metallics, transparent inks on foil or metallized stock, et cetera
2) aren't the wet and dry measurements supposed to be the same with the polarized unit

</x-tad-smaller><x-tad-smaller>Rich Apollo
314-344-1144
email@hidden
www.prioritylitho.com</x-tad-smaller>

 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

Follow-Ups:
- Re: GRACoL densities
  - From: Terry Wyse <email@hidden>
- Re: GRACoL densities
  - From: Roger Breton <email@hidden>

Prev by Date: The future of print
Next by Date: Re: profiles and pantone colors
Previous by thread: Re: GRACoL densities
Next by thread: Re: GRACoL densities
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread