Re: Colorsync-users Digest, Vol 2, Issue 174
Re: Colorsync-users Digest, Vol 2, Issue 174
- Subject: Re: Colorsync-users Digest, Vol 2, Issue 174
- From: John MacDonald <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 03 May 2005 10:16:37 -0400
- Organization: Dodge Color, Inc.
Hi Steve,
I'm not sure if I understand what you mean by a difference in the
stability of the metamerism (I'm paraphrasing, so forgive me if I put
words in your mouth!) Are you talking about the color stability under
different lighting conditions, or short term changes in color due to ink
migration, or something else?
Thanks,
John MacDonald
Steve,
Date: Mon, 2 May 2005 12:00:06 -0700 (PDT)
From: Steve Lehning <email@hidden>
Subject: Metamerism in proofing stock
To: email@hidden
Message-ID: <email@hidden>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
We are going to conducting a little test amoungst some
proofing stock. We currently are using GMG RIP, GMG
stock, Epson 9600 and ultrachrome inks. We recently
recieved a proof from another printer utilizing GMG
RIP, Epson 4000, Ultrachrome inks and Oris proofing
stock. We were amazed at the difference in metamersim
in the Oris stock compared to GMG stock. The Oris
stock seems to be allot more stable in this area as
compared to GMG. Just wondering if anyone else out
there has done similar test, and what results has
everyone else found to be the best for metamerism.
Steve Lehning
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden