• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: GRACoL densities
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: GRACoL densities


  • Subject: Re: GRACoL densities
  • From: Rich Apollo <email@hidden>
  • Date: Wed, 4 May 2005 07:20:53 -0500


On May 4, 2005, at 6:39 AM, email@hidden wrote:

Yes, that was the point of polarization filters that you DON'T have to
account for dry-down but the problem is that the densities seem to be
whacked compared with other instruments.
<x-tad-smaller>
Terry,
Did you ever have the opportunity to compare the dry readings between a polarized instrument and a non-polarized instrument? Or to assess the consistency between wet and dry readings with a polarized instrument?


</x-tad-smaller><x-tad-smaller>Rich Apollo
314-344-1144
email@hidden
www.prioritylitho.com</x-tad-smaller>

 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: GRACoL densities
      • From: Thomas Holm/Pixl <email@hidden>
  • Prev by Date: Re: profiles and pantone colors
  • Next by Date: test patches and Spectrolino
  • Previous by thread: Re: GRACoL densities
  • Next by thread: Re: GRACoL densities
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread