Re: New EyeOne ruler and soft case
Re: New EyeOne ruler and soft case
- Subject: Re: New EyeOne ruler and soft case
- From: Ernst Dinkla <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2005 14:57:19 +0100
neil_snape wrote:
Linearizing puts the device in a state that normally makes easier work for
the profile creation software as the measurement values will be able to have
a better smoothness with much less twisting of the grid points in the
profile tables. This means basically less or no banding, higher detail and
better accuracy without dropped values due to too large of variation in the
measured values between grid point resolution.
That's what I thought was best. But would a non-linear but
calibrated state of a printer that comes even closer to the
profiling goal not be better ? And to stretch it a bit further
if that non-linear state asks less correction of the printer
in the calibration process wouldn't that make everything
smoother? I have used other analogies before but if you need
to make a cube first to make a ball and the shape you started
from is an egg ............
Is a linearised device the best base for all ICC profiling ?
Could Epson's Colorbase be doing things differently given its
black box paper settings and the RGB printer profiles on top
of that ?
--
Ernst Dinkla
www.pigment-print.com
( unvollendet )
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden