RE: [OT] Dot shape prevalence
RE: [OT] Dot shape prevalence
- Subject: RE: [OT] Dot shape prevalence
- From: "Matt Beals" <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2005 13:53:43 -0700
Scitex always had such nice screening. And if it wasn't good enough, you
could always build your own screen set with their Excel spreadsheet.
Although adding a little extra p-noise seemed to work well.
Matt Beals
Consultant
Enfocus Certified Trainer, Markzware Recognized Trainer
(206) 618-2537 - Cell
(425) 697-5838 - Home
mailto:email@hidden
callto://mattbeals98026
Come visit me at:
http://www.mattbeals.com
http://www.actionlistexchange.net
http://mattbeals.blogspot.com
-----Original Message-----
From: colorsync-users-bounces+matt=email@hidden
[mailto:colorsync-users-bounces+matt=email@hidden] On
Behalf Of RS
Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2005 1:38 PM
To: email@hidden
Subject: Re: [OT] Dot shape prevalence
Glenn,
I'd like to hear more about the composite dot. What shape(s) did it take
on over the range of tonal values?
Glenn Huish wrote:
I've had much better luck with elliptical dots for fleshtone work.
Although I still miss Scitex Composite dots. (sigh...)
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden