Re: Anyone use Aperture yet?
Re: Anyone use Aperture yet?
- Subject: Re: Anyone use Aperture yet?
- From: Steve Kale <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 23:53:47 +0100
- Thread-topic: Anyone use Aperture yet?
What about curve adjustments and chromatic aberration correction? Noise
reduction and sharpening? Is tethered shooting supported? (seemed like it
from one of the videos but I don't think it's stated explicitly) Also it
will depend on just how good it's conversion renders colour, noise etc.
Workflow is cool but it's got a lot of testing before it proves its mettle.
How about managing camera to camera differences in colour rendition?
(Thomas Fors little routine for calibrating ACR is very good and ACR can be
calibrate for different white balance settings.)
> From: "email@hidden" <email@hidden>
> Reply-To: <email@hidden>
> Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 18:43:22 -0400
> To: <email@hidden>, <email@hidden>
> Subject: RE: Anyone use Aperture yet?
>
> It appears that Aperture is both robust and fairly ICC savvy. It uses the
> Colorsync Utility to set defaults, plus a
> softproofing function to set an output profile. Very cool and likely to
> become a strong argument for photographers
> being on a Mac platform. I can't see a down side. Most details are
> extremely well thought out. Combines with a new
> Quickkeys-like/Applescript-like GUI to streamline workflow, called
> Automator.
>
> - Jon
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden