Re: Anyone use Aperture yet?
Re: Anyone use Aperture yet?
A couple interesting features of Aperture:
1) The canned working spaces in ACR are no longer a limitation, as Aperture
allows the user to designate the WS of
choice
2) Aperture and the Automator apps allow full bouncing in and out of PS to
complete any task. Aperture does not
pretend to do PS, but rather to make the workflow both more streamlined and
offers a feature set beyond PS's
capabilities.
Anyone remember Live Picture? Aperture seems to work on a proxy and due to
the high HorsePower requirements,
everything seems to happen in real time. Much faster than any other option
available today.
- Jon
Original Message:
I wonder about how Aperture's handling of Camera Raw compares to the breadth
of adjustments offered by Adobe Camera Raw. From the screen shots of
Aperture on the Apple site it seems that the options are not quite as many
and/or as extensive. But they may be. It's just not clear to me yet.
Also -- not to be the usual negative old me -- there may be the expected tad
of "manna-from-heaven" hype associated with its introduction, in that image
handling is not just sorting, color balancing and resizing (though these are
of great importance, and it's likely that Aperture is very adept at them),
but also masking, content editing and retouching, none of which Aperture may
be fit to handle. (Don't sell your copy of Photoshop quite yet!)
But I haven't yet seen or used this software in the cyberflesh. Maybe Andrew
Rodney or other list participants have had a "close encounter" and would
care to share more pertinent comments?
Thank you.
--------------
Marco Ugolini
Mill Valley, CA
--------------------------------------------------------------------
mail2web - Check your email from the web at
http://mail2web.com/ .
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden