Re: profiling a digital lab?
Re: profiling a digital lab?
- Subject: Re: profiling a digital lab?
- From: Kamil Tresnak <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2005 02:17:57 +0200
Hello Eric,
i have good experiences with Fuji Frontier (FDI network). As i know,
guys in labs have detailed workflow how keep their machines in standard
condition (maintenance and operation) and therefore it is possible to
get very good "inter-shop" match. But still this is all about people ...
Best regards
Message: 4
Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2005 17:43:52 -0400
From: Eric Bullock <email@hidden>
Subject: profiling a digital lab?
To: email@hidden
Message-ID: <email@hidden>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Is it folly to attempt to "profile" a digital lab? A new client sends
their files out to several labs with (usually) disappointing results.
From the way they describe their workflow it sounds like everything
is sound, so I'm thinking it may be a worthwhile experiment to try
profiling the lab. Given fluctuations in RA-4 chemistry is this
advisable?
Of greater interest to me is what these labs do to the files they
receive. If each one is adjusted for exposure & color (like a piece
of film) then obviously this won't work. I am under the assumption
that most labs want to receive sRGB files and that they just run them
as-is. If that is indeed the case then I don't see why this wouldn't
work, except for the chemistry issue mentioned above.
If anyone has had any success doing this, and has labs that they've
worked with successfully in this regard I would welcome your comments
& suggestions.
Cheers,
Eric Bullock
PixelPusherz Imaging
www.pixelpusherz.net
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden