• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Metamerism vs Color Constancy
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Metamerism vs Color Constancy


  • Subject: Re: Metamerism vs Color Constancy
  • From: Marco Ugolini <email@hidden>
  • Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 13:48:34 -0700

Correction: "nest to one another" should read "next to one another."
--------------
Marco Ugolini
Mill Valley, CA

> From: Marco Ugolini <email@hidden>
> Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 13:17:13 -0700
> To: Roger Breton <email@hidden>
> Cc: ColorSync Users Mailing List <email@hidden>
> Subject: Re: Metamerism vs Color Constancy
>
> [snip]
>
> So, illuminant metamerism can be observed when TWO identical copies of a
> print (same inks, same spectral compositions) are shown nest to one another
> in a light booth, separated by a divider, and each under a different
> illuminant (say, one under illuminant A, the other under illuminant D65). In
> that case one can say that you are observing a metameric failure, because
> the TWO appear different from each other.
>
> [snip]


 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

References: 
 >Re: Metamerism vs Color Constancy (From: Marco Ugolini <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: 12-bit file from drum scanner
  • Next by Date: RE: =Color constancy and metamerism
  • Previous by thread: Re: Metamerism vs Color Constancy
  • Next by thread: Re: Metamerism vs Color Constancy
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread