Re: Microsoft's color-management claims
Re: Microsoft's color-management claims
- Subject: Re: Microsoft's color-management claims
- From: Roger Breton <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 23:00:44 -0400
Graeme wrote:
> The point is that if the output space has a limited red gamut compared
> to the input space, but the input image only uses a portion of the red
> gamut in the input space, there is no need to compress all reds down.
> Reds would only need to be compressed enough to fit the images red into
> the destination gamut.
So the whole idea is to do "adaptative" gamut mapping?
But, in order to implement this -- you already do this in argyll? -- you
need more than knowledge about the source gamut: you also need to know what
part of the source gamut is the image consuming, no? So, if this is the
case, there will have to be a lot of processing that will need to be donw
for each conversion: aren't we back to the days of LinoColor MacCTU board?
Roger Breton | Laval, Canada | email@hidden
http://pages.infinit.net/graxx
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden