• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Microsoft's color-management claims
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Microsoft's color-management claims


  • Subject: Re: Microsoft's color-management claims
  • From: Marco Ugolini <email@hidden>
  • Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 12:58:06 -0700

In a message dated Thu, 22 Sep 2005 09:39:46, Bruce Fraser wrote:

>> By the way, here comes my turn for "stupid question time": why can't ICC
>> profiles work from XYZ values instead of CIELAB, as they do now?
>
> Stupid factoid time: All matrix ICC profiles use XYZ as PCS. It's
> only LUT-based profiles that use Lab.

You are right. I posed my question incorrectly.

What I EXACTLY meant to ask was "why can't ICC LUT profiles work from XYZ
values instead of CIELAB, as they do now."

And even put this way, my question may still be no less stupid...

--------------
Marco Ugolini
Mill Valley, CA


 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

References: 
 >Re: Microsoft's color-management claims (From: bruce fraser <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Metamerism vs Color Constancy
  • Next by Date: Re: Metamerism vs Color Constancy
  • Previous by thread: Re: Microsoft's color-management claims
  • Next by thread: Re: Colorsync-users Digest, Vol 2, Issue 370
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread