U.S. Web Coated (SWOP) v2
U.S. Web Coated (SWOP) v2
- Subject: U.S. Web Coated (SWOP) v2
- From: Kevin Muldoon <email@hidden>
- Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2006 00:05:32 -0400
I also know that I can easily see differences in hue in Waterproofs,
Matchprints and Approvals and probably all SWOP certified proofing
systems. I am well aware that SWOP covers a wide zone that we can be
within and still be 'right'.
However, I'm slowly concluding that U.S. Web Coated (SWOP) v2 isn't
even in the same ballpark. I find it curious that SWOP organization
will put their stamp of approval on monitors but still hasn't issued
it's own ICC profile. What are we to make of this?
So, which is wrong? Are all of the SWOP certified proofers incorrect
OR is this profile supplied by Adobe seriously flawed in some manner?
As a color separator, I'll put my money on the SWOP proof. As a color
manager, I would have bet on the profile.
When using U.S. Web Coated (SWOP) v2 separations, I always see a very
consistent blue-on-screen/purple-on-proof in my output to Matchprint
and Kodak Approval proofing systems. Most notably with 4C separations
of Reflex Blue and other colors of it's ilk.
All thoughts on the subject are appreciated.
-- Kevin Muldoon
BTW, I'm not running a #5 Groundwood base. Would be happy to
reprofile with this paper should anyone point this out as a potential
issue.
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden